I wanted to share an email I received this week. I thought it would make for an interesting discussion. The letter writer requested I leave her name out, but it’s reprinted with permission. I did edit for brevity (again with permission) as the original letter was very long:
Dear Deb,
My friend is always taking me to task because I write for two web content sites. One of them is a place that gets a bad rap for being a “content mill”. I like the work. It’s fun and challenging. She says it’s demeaning and low paying. In January we made a bet to see who earned more with our writing in 2009. My friend writes for a trade publication and helps businesses write their web site content. We each agreed to work roughly the same amount of time each day which wasn’t always possible because I had work every day and she didn’t. She spent time each day looking for more work and I didn’t need to. As of today, I earned $52,000 and my friend earned $37,000. She said it’s not the point. The places I work for aren’t good for writers.
I would like to ask the FWJ readers and community why is it worse for me to earn more money if it’s for a content site?
Thank you, Deb. I’m looking forward to the response,
- C.A.
What do you think, FWJ community?
I still stand by what I’ve posted before – writers must find the right mix of gigs that works for their unique circumstances. Personally I’d be DELIGHTED with making that much money from content sites.
It all spends the same, doesn’t it? If you’re doing what you love, and you can put food on the table, and you’re not hurting anyone or ripping off their work, then what does it matter? Content mills serve their purpose, just as trade publications do. There’s no one job that’s right for everyone and their situation. And what’s right for someone today may not be right for them in six months. It’s no one else’s business why you do what you do. If it’s right for you, then do it.
This “friend” employed a common debating technique (not a very honorable one, mind you) called “changing the goal post.” They set an objective standard…the friend is proven wrong…”Ah, that’s not the point.” *changes goalpost*.
I don’t understand the infatuation a lot of writers have with demeaning others’ choices. Sure, I don’t like writing for content sites, but I don’t go around insulting others who do. I know some excellent writers who enjoy the consistency and stability of writing a set amount of content site articles a day.
I think this is a neat challenge. If either of the writers involved were malicious, it doesn’t come through that way in the letter. Part of the reason I am looking to go full-time freelance is due to the earning potential–it’s higher than what I’ll get in publishing, even if I stick ONLY to content-writing sites (which I don’t).
It sounds like C.A. and her friend are both diligent writers. C.A. seems to have a lot of discipline, which is what it takes to make that kind of money at content sites.
I wish them the best of success!
I agree with the above – I can’t find anything wrong with making $52,000 doing the kind of writing you enjoy!
The friend’s reasoning against writing for content sites was that they are demeaning and low-paying. Obviously the latter was proven untrue. Why then are they demeaning? Why are they bad for writers? I would have to hear the arguments to support these points.
I write for two content sites, both of which have done nothing but improve my writing, help me to learn about SEO, and join a supportive community of other writers. I don’t see anything wrong with that.
I agree with all of you, but Jeanne makes a good point: “writers must find the right mix of gigs that works for their unique circumstances.” That is what is important. Personally, I do not desire to sit and pump out content all day. That said, I do work for content sites and enjoy the stability and opportunity of choice. At this juncture in my life, I do not care to write more than 5 articles a day, if that. I moved away from the necessary deadline pressure by choice when I left the daily and weekly newspaper industry. There is no right or wrong way to express yourself in words – at least as it relates to your choice of places to write.
That is funny, funny stuff. $52,000 is a solid living and last I checked, content mills don’t require stripping or car sales, so I don’t see how it can be considered demeaning. Some people are never satisfied.
It doesn’t matter what anyone thinks about the way “YOU” make a living! I don’t work for content sites but I do write web content which isn’t considered legit verses print. As writers we put ourselves and our work out there for the world to see and judge. That’s why alot of writers choose pen names. Abuse in our profession is actually normal!
I have found that the steadiness of content mill work can make up for a lot. I am switching my blend of mill work to query work for the upcoming year, but I must admit that the content mill work that I did made that possible. It is not so much a paradox, as a balancing act that each writer must negotiate for herself.
I don’t write content full time (though I’d love to make C.A.’s money, so maybe I should?) However, I find it a nice way to supplement between projects or just went I want some extra cash.
I make, on average, $2,000-$3,000 per month off of content sites. Even though the topics aren’t always interesting or challenging, at least I’m spending my day doing what a writer should do–writing. Instead of spending my days sending out queries, I’d rather be cranking out articles and honing my writing skills.
If content sites make others feel ashamed, they shouldn’t write for them, but there’s no need to call them demeaning. While the work may not be prestigious or even empowering, it’s regular work that can pay $30-50 per hour. I can’t see where there’s any shame in that; it’s a lot more than what a lot of print journalists are making right now.
Depends on how you view your writing. I would never call my writing “art”. I write for money! Some people write for art. A very, very lucky few are able to do both!
Hey,
The numbers bear the proof. But I have to disagree with John’s comment about $52,000 offering a “solid” living. If it’s one of two incomes or if for a single person, fine. But $52,000 in revenue is not $52,000 in wages. Health and other benefits, the “employer half” of FICA, marketing, office and any other overhead need to ocme out of that. Don’t forget retirment saving, too. Even a minor health procedure like an outpatient surgery will quickly make that amount not too solid — though certainly not terrible (which I would consider $37,000 annually to be in today’s market — again, I’m not discussing supplementary income.
Hi Phil,
You’re absolutely right to always consider the necessary deductions, however, this is true for any profession. Even the “real life” salaried job that pays $57,000 doesn’t really pay $57,000 after all the deductions – there’s just someone else handling that for you.
no, the wage job doesn’t mean $57,000 in take home, but a $57,000 in wages is more than $57,000 in self employment, even if only for the “employer half” of fica, without the other overhead (office, Internet, computer, printer, etc., all provided at an ‘office.’). This is a major misunderstanding among people who go into business for themselves — not just writers. I saw this as a small business writer and while involved in an entreprenuership program at a local university. So, while $57,000 in self-employment shouldn’t be ignored, I think “solid” is a suggesting the that revenue is better than it really is, in most instances.
However, I would have loved it if my wife pulled in that kind of money, but for a primary breadwinner, I wouldn’t consider it so. For example, health insurance alone — even without dental, vision or other uncovered expenses, would eat up nearly 15 percent of that amount, at least with my plan.
Should have been $52,000 in above comment, not $57.000.
Right you are, Phil. You do earn less as a freelancer despite deductions. However I also believe there are other costs that make up for it. For example, less money spent on gas or transportation, no child care (if the freelancer is like me and opts to work at home) and less money spent on clothes and other incidentals. I do thing when you factor it all it balances out give or take a few bucks here or there.
One word answer to your question:
Scoreboard.
I have to say I’m amazed at how much people can make at content mills.
So far, I’ve looked at Demand, Helium, WiseGeek, Suite 101… and it seems to me that unless I’m writing only about topics about which I already know a great deal, I’d spend much too much time researching to make it work. And the topics are so technical – they’re drill-down topics in auto mechanics, web design, etc.
What topics do you content mill earners write about? are you solidly knowledgeable about these highly technical fields? How much research do you do to write a $10-$15 article?
Thanks,
Lisa
Lisa,
The writers I know who are successful writing for content sites choose topics they know. Other wise it’s too much time spent writing and researching.
Lisa,
I was a tax preparer for two years, so I write a lot of tax articles. I’m an avid gardener, so I write those as well. I’m also a little silly, so I write articles about Teddy Bear Tea Parties. When there aren’t many articles in my specialties, I work on my book proposal.
-Jenn
yeh – I seem to be out of the loop in terms of expertise for content mills. I’m a pro in areas that seem to be outside the content mill world (fundraising, homeschooling, parenting, crafts, hands-on science, general science topics, etc.). Sadly, I’m a generalist, which means my ability to write a technical “how-to” article is close to zero… Tried WiseGeek, which was at one point interested in general science topics (what is silver, for example). Now, though, they are really into the “how do you use dream weaver on a mac to create an animation” kind of stuff. Fraid my answer is – “I dunno!”
Lias
I would love to know the names of the content sites she writes for and how long it took for her to achieve that level of income. I am like her friend, in that I write for a number of blogs and websites but am not yeat at that level of earnings. I have tended to stay away from the content sites such as Demand Studios, as I was under the impression that earnings were limited.
I would be interested to hear from people who do write for content websites: how much time do you spend, what do you write about, how intense is the SEO emphasis, do you feel that the site is honest about page views or click-throughs, etc.
Please feel free to send replies to the E-mail address I supplied.
Rich in Northeast Ohio
Personally, I think satisfying your own internal goals when it comes to income and definitions of career success is more important than competing with friends and colleagues.
It sounds like both writers have chosen the type of work they want to do and feel comfortable doing. There is nothing wrong with either choice, no matter how much each person is making.
I agree with everyone else, there’s no right or wrong here, it depends on what the individual writer is comfortable with. Personally, I think $52,000 is pretty darn nice! Sure it’s not a fortune, but it would definitely help with the bills.
pls i am a novice i need u guys to tell content sites where i can start to write presently i dont have any job and i have got a lot of bills to pay like the internet i am using now and also how do i receive my payment , pls kindly help everything is just like magic to me. [email protected]
Deb,
You are right about some of those costs we don’t have. And child care would be a big one. Mine are older, and my wife was home when they were younger. I coached them for a few years, but could not have spent the time doing so if I hadn’t been making enough. Years ago, $52,000 would have been OK, not great, but OK. But with health care costs doubling (we already retired one dentist five years ago — he was my age!), inflation in the cost of most basic goods, not to mention higher cost of schooling (one of mine is now in college), I still stand by my premise that $52,000 today is less than “solid.” That hardly gives one enough to save for a downpayment on a house — the “0 down” don’t exist any more. While it would be fine for someone with only a couple of years in the business or as a supplemental income, it’s still less than what I would call solid. To be solid, I think one should have enough for savings, and child costs (even if you take care of them yourself) can be tremendous. Each of mine has had major surgery. Took 10 years to pay off the first (and I was above that $52,000). I will be paying for the second one til I’m pushing daisies.
Phil – “solid” is all in the eye of the beholder. If you have a partner who’s also making $50,000, you’re in good shape. If you’re single, you’re in good shape. If you’re retired, supplementing your income, etc. – ditto.
Bottom line: if you’re not making enough as a freelancer, and you’re the sole earner, it’s probably time to look for a full time job!
Lisa
I think I would not enjoy writing that much content, ’cause I would probably start to drool and twitch and talk to the dog EVEN MORE. But I think if that person likes it, then that person is in the right line of work!
52K sounds like a good income, but I had to crunch the numbers to figure this out for myself (and I’m bad at numbers, so bear with me!).
52,000 per year — if you’re making $20 per article — means you are churning out 50 articles per week. It takes me personally about 2 hours on average to do a 500-word (or less) article that involves a quick research-and-write-up job. This means I’d be spending 10 hours a day doing just that. This only leaves me with 9.7 hours per day to myself — mostly for sleep, with 1.7 hours per day left over for eating, relaxing and spending time with my husband.
Of course, this depends on how fast you write and how much research you do, but I do a *lot* of research for my articles and oftentimes interview primary sources. There is no way I could do this. Does C.A. only work for content sites? That’s a whole lot of constant cranking out without time for the brain to breathe!
C.A. said (and I hope she comes by and weighs in) that she worked for two content sites. Now, I know from personal experience that it’s not difficult to write a 400 word “How to” piece on a topic I know very well. In fact, I was/am a wedding writer. Writing a 400 word piece on how to choose the right wedding veil doesn’t take long at all. It depends on the topic and a writer’s expertise.
If you enjoy what you do and you are earning enough to sustain your lifestyle (while putting some money away for rainy days and retirement), who’s to say that you can’t continue doing what you’re doing? It is worth noting, however, that earning $52k as a freelancer is not the same as $52k in income from an employer. You have additional overhead costs, health insurance, and so on.
$52k a year is “solid” if you are single or part of a dual-income household. It probably isn’t enough to sustain a family on its own though.
Pingback: Freelance Writing Jobs for November 27, 2009 : Freelance Writing Jobs for Web and Print
I think that the young people of today are forcing established bureaucracy to change old accepted practices. I think that the world in general is opting for even more choices. Supply and demand has been a cornerstone of our marketplace for along time.
So who am I to judge “real” writing?
Pingback: In the Sphere: Black Friday Edition | BlueFur.com
The same stuff I’ve been talking about for months (and anyone who has hung out here for any length of time knows this).
Anyone who claims that content sites don’t pay have absolutely no clue about the market.
If I worked full-time this year I would have made just under 54,000 USD, averaging 28 USD per hour. Full time assumes 8 hours a day, 5 days a week.
@ Phil: 52k is a very solid wage. It depends on where you live, your personal cost of living,and many other factors. For example, my wife and I have a situation where our TOTAL cost of living INCLUDING entertainment for the year is a maximum of 10k USD. That means anything above and beyond 10k goes straight into the bank. There is a reason we take 5-6 trips a year throughout Europe. I’m not even 30 years old yet (although that’s closing in January!)
If I were to work full time at what I do and make 50 grand a year, that means 40 thousand USD per year that I can spend on whatever I want. I work for 10 years, that’s 400k in the bank, assuming no emergency expenditures. My wife’s part-time job actually pays our living expenses (she’s also a full-time student) which means if I wanted to, I could put an easy 50k every single year in the bank. That’s half a million in savings in 10 years. Anything more I make only increases the rate and speed. Not bad for a middle-income bracket when most people who make 50k a year have to eke out an existence. So 50k is solid income…depending on the circumstances.
@ some of the other comments. I am in literal shock at how little some of you are making. I’ve seen comments throughout this thread regarding “oh how I wish I was making that kind of money being a freelance writer.”
What’s stopping you!?!? The only person standing between you and success is YOU. Not the market. Not the competition.
There is an entire WORLD worth of jobs out there right now. I pull clients from every corner of the globe. In fact, 70-80% of my clients are European-based. It takes 10 minutes to Google prospective markets and send queries.
I’m wrapping up my second year of freelancing. In fact, I did so well this year that I’m taking the entire month of December off to focus on the hard launch of my website, finish the first of the three e-books I have planned for next year, and start marketing the brand and networking. At no point in 2009 did I make less than 25 USD per hour, and I did at least 70% of my work from content mills. I’ve seen some comments regarding how it’s “impossible” to write 500 word articles in less than 2 hours, and I fall back on the old “you have no idea what you are talking about” comment.
If you know the topic intimately (and most people who choose to write for content sites do), you don’t have research, and you can pound out a 500 word article in 15-20 minutes, tops. Even quicker if you use a speech to text program like Dragon NaturallySpeaking.
But even if you don’t…the 21st century is all about fast, disposable content. You aren’t writing Pulitzer prize winning content here. You are writing content for a content mill. It’s not expected to be of the same caliber as an article in the New York Times. It’s meant to fill a website, to put words on a page, and draw in readers. It’s fluff.
Now, you can choose to be the “artist” and claim that you won’t write anything unless it takes you 5 hours to prep it and write it because otherwise it’s “crap”, but don’t come complaining when your friend makes double the income you did.
I write fiction for the art. I write content for the cash. It’s as simple as that.
At the end of the day the only people not making money in the current freelance industry are the people who don’t really want to succeed. They come up with a million excuses as to why it’s not their fault, but when it comes right down to it they lack the motivation to truly see it through to the end. Success isn’t born of luck. It is a direct result of getting your ass out there and doing whatever it takes to make as much money as possible for the least amount of effort. I’m not here to have my name remembered (although if my fiction work ends up being recognized, w00t!) when I look at content work. I’m here for a paycheck. And I’m going to do whatever it takes to get that paycheck so my wife and I can live the lives we want to live.
TW – I agree with you about the paycheck vs. art point. they’re not the same, and they can’t be.
But I do have some issues with what you’re saying.
1. content sites are available, but they’re by no means the sum total of opportunities for freelancers – nor do they suit the talents, interests or experience of all freelancers. granted that it’s nice to know the work is there when you need it, there’s simply no reason to solely churn out “quick and dirty” pieces when there really are opportunities to do major projects for clients who are doing significant work. Not only do I make more money on average writing for many of those clients (museums, hospitals, universities, major educational institutions, etc.), but I can feel that I’ve done something worth doing at the end of the day.
2. we all understand that you’re happily living at very low cost with no kids outside of the US, and that’s great. but to suggest that a $10,000 a year lifestyle makes sense for everyone is kinda silly.
When I was in my early 20′s, I paid $175 a month for rent, had no car, and we all cooked together in a group rental house. I made $15,000 a year and felt wealthy. That was great. Now I’m 50, have two kids, a mortgage, a car, and need a lot more cash. That, too, is great. Different, but great.
Lisa
Lisa,
You, and you alone, are responsible for your cost of living. Is it my fault (or anyone’s fault, for that matter) that you are in a position where you are required to make more than 50k a year to make ends meet or to feel wealthy?
There are quite a few people out there who choose how to make the most out of life, rather than letting life choose for them.
You claim that (and I quote), “here’s simply no reason to solely churn out “quick and dirty” pieces when there really are opportunities to do major projects for clients who are doing significant work. Not only do I make more money on average writing for many of those clients (museums, hospitals, universities, major educational institutions, etc.), but I can feel that I’ve done something worth doing at the end of the day.”
You are making the assumption that “quick and dirty” is somehow “less prestigious” than what you do. You are judging content writers as beneath you, because you “feel” that you’ve done something worth doing at the end of the day.
Content sites are an amazing tool for the modern freelancer. It’s quick, it’s easy, and it’s a fast paycheck. To those of us who make a significant amount of money doing content sites (as in the case of the example that started this whole thread), are we not “doing something worth doing at the end of the day”? After all, we have put food on the table and made a damn good wage. Why does it matter WHO we are writing for?
My example of where I live and my cost of living is additional proof that for a great many people 50k a year is a great wage. For you, you CHOSE to have kids. You CHOSE to have a mortgage. You, and you alone, put yourself in a position where you require X amount of dollars per year to be profitable above and beyond the cost of your living. I’ve used this example elsewhere in the past, but for the sake of argument let’s say you are someone who makes 80k a year, and your cost of living with 3 kids, mortgage, 2 cars, etc., comes to 78k a year. At the end of the year you put 2k in your savings.
Meanwhile, here’s a guy who makes 25k a year working at McDonalds. His cost of living is 15k a year because he lives with a friend in an apartment, has no kids, and at the end of the year he puts 15k in his savings account.
The above example is exactly why you (and others) should not make baseless assumptions about whether or not 50k is a good/not good wage. Maybe it’s not a good wage for YOU, but you are not the judge nor are you the jury for the entire global writing community.
50k a year is a damn good wage for a great many writers. Until you are in their shoes you have no basis for your comments.
I said absolutely nothing judgmental about your choices – or about your income. It’s obviously a good life for you, and you enjoy it. Which is terrific.
But the fact that it works well for you doesn’t mean its the only “good” choice.
OF COURSE we choose our lives. I wouldn’t choose a childless life away from the people I know and love – though I can understand the attraction of such a life. And OF COURSE we choose our clients.
I’ve worked for content mills, and am sure I will again. But I have to say, though, that I do find value and satisfaction in doing projects that connect me with a client, a community, and a mission. I enjoy playing a part in something bigger than myself.
My point, TW, is that your life is not “the” life, and your choices are not “the” choices. It’s wonderful that you’re happy – and perhaps some folks here will follow your path. Others won’t.
TW, I am NOT complaining about my costs, my income or my clients. I LIKE the life I lead, and I’m happy with the choices I’ve made. Please don’t assume that needing more money for my chosen lifestyle equates with unhappiness or frustration.
Lisa
And neither have I said anything judgmental about yours. I am simply stating facts. I never once said that my life is the only life to live, nor do I assume that people should mirror my choices. Assumptions being what they are, and all that!
At the end of the day what people choose to do with their lives is simply that…a choice. It is neither wrong nor right. What matters is if the person behind those choices is happy with them, and if they are being successful in their lives.
I understand that certain individuals tire of me talking about my personal circumstances, but much like the guy who runs Passive Income (Pat), I find that it is incredibly important to share everything behind what made me as successful as I am today to not only motivate other writers to do the same, but to inspire others to take charge of their lives and stop living under the thumb of what someone else tells them they should/shouldn’t be doing.
Trade publications are great. Prestige is great. But at the end of the day, what is more important? Your name in the byline or a roof over the head of your family and food on their table?
It all boils down to choice, and just as much as I am unqualified to judge whether or not your choices are the right ones or not, so is everyone else when it comes to looking at other writers. There is no such thing as “one way”, and until writers stop sneering down their noses at each other these types of threads will continue to pop up.
TW – I’m not trying to say that writing for content mills is “unprestigious.” I’ve done plenty of “unprestigious” work without a byline – press releases, brochures, you name it.
But I don’t think you have to choose between prestige and a roof over your head… or ignore the possibility of writing something you care about (and I gather you’re writing fiction which you care about deeply) because it’s faster to write for content mills.
IMHO, moderation in all things makes the most sense. As a result, I personally take on a wide range of projects. And I recommend the same to others. I think that approach fulfills many different needs.
Lisa
Pingback: Freelance writing: is it possible to make $100,000 in a year? – Complete Writing Solutions
I think it is about the passion that you had. No matter what is the money that you earn, you should have passion in your work.
Hey guys, respectful disagreement please. Let’s steer this back to a positive discussion before as it’s starting to border on personal attacks and I’ll have to delete the comments.
Mmmm fiction
I very much do have the “art versus paycheck” mentality, and I’ve often referenced actors like Sir Laurence Olivier who publicly stated on more than one occasion that he did films for the paycheck and theater for the art.
Now, I could spend ALL my time sending off short stories, but here’s the thing: right now, for example, I have a short story that has been in submission since June, and I have yet to hear back from the editor as to whether or not it’s been accepted or rejected. I had another magazine who paid for a story last year go out of business last month, just before they were going to print the latest issue with my story in it. Another editor got back to me last week after a 4 month waiting period.
The fastest I have ever heard back from an editor is 6 weeks, and the one in particular that I just mentioned that has been in since June is the longest (approaching 6 months now). If I were trying to feed my family with fiction, we’d be out in the streets, starving. Freelance writing for clients + content sites gives me the paycheck aspect that I need to provide us with the things we want out of life. I love content sites because I don’t have to query, I don’t have to pitch, I don’t have to wait, and I don’t have to run the risk that even if something sells it might be 6 months to a year before it ever sees the light of day (if at all), and in the meantime you generally have to wait 2 years before the rights revert back to you.
Content sites have titles already laid out for me. The tone is already suggested. All I have to do is show up, pick the articles, fill in the blanks, and walk away with a paycheck. My new phrase that drives my wife nuts is “bing, bang, bucks”. It sounds like a cheesy car salesman line, but it’s fairly accurate.
I just love the e-mail that started this all
Classic two-face. Writer A thinks their job is “better” and naturally assumes they make more money, then when writer B shows up and makes 15k more, the only thing Writer A can come up with is “well that wasn’t the point. My job is more prestigious than yours.”
Bzzzz. Wrong answer
It takes me 45-60 minutes to write an article of this type. Sometimes less if it’s on a topic I know. I rarely make less than $500 a week writing for content mills (the last week of October I made $850 in a week). It’s absolutely doable. Sometimes a little boring, but once the money shows up in my PayPal account, I definitively don’t care about the boredom anymore.
Interesting thread. I just had to add my two cents.
I have written for content sites, but quickly became bored. There was no sense of accomplishment associated with the fluffy type of article that moves well at content mills.
I prefer writing and marketing articles that have substance and merit.
Rather the spending time on SEO for my articles, I better enjoy spending my time engaging in face to face interviews with interesting people, putting time into quality research efforts, networking with editors, as well as working with demanding editors who critique and help me hone my writing skills.
There is too much low quality writing on the internet and I don’t enjoy being part of it. I also think spending too much time writing for content mills will stunt a quality writers style. At content mills, any quality of writing is accepted. Hence there is no need to improve your writing skill, only your SEO skills.
That’s just my own opinion, however. If someone is happy churning out low quality articles for content mills, more power to them.
For my part, when I was expending energy writing for content mills, I felt empty. I prefer the prestige of writing an article of substance for a high-quality publication
Sara,
I don’t know what sites you were writing for, but the ones I have chosen are more picky about your content. Reading between the lines, you would consider my writing second rate. You come across with a case of tunnel vision and I’m sensing that was not your intention. Please broaden your perspective and consider another situation that is not less honorable than the one you have chosen.
I am mobility-challenged with multiple sclerosis and had to channel my education and talents into research and writing. This also means that participating at the bidding sites was not the “happening place” for me. I needed something steady, dependable and available.
I choose titles or topics on Sunday nights and try to have 2-3 that overlap. That way, I can do research for those little bunches of articles by using a keyword or phrase that returns information I can use for all. This means that I won’t need to research EACH article before I write it. And, yes, it takes me two hours to get through an article as the tremors in my limbs, especially hands, causes me to make unintentional typos.
Everything I write is interesting to me as I am a generalist, also. Some say that my closest living relative is a sponge, but I consider that as a compliment! I do not write query letters, which take unpaid time to churn out and send. I never “wait” for communications from my editors – they are prompt and timely. I am never “wondering” when my writing will appear in print as it is accepted, returned for rewrite or rejected within 48-72 hours. Since I have about 3 productive hours each weekday, I need the time for paid writing.
My brain is totally active, I am doing something productive and I’m getting paid to do it. So, when you say it is no wonder that we see the unspoken, but underlying, statement that you are better than any of us because you write articles of substance for a high-quality publication. And the rest of us … don’t?
I know this is a bit off topic but have you tried speech recoqnition software? I use Dragon naturally speaking because i only type 40 words per minute but i can speak 130 words a minute. This has helped me research and finish articles in much less time than I could before.
Pingback: Breaking 100k a year writing for content mills: fact or fiction?